Exam 350-901 topic 1 question 101 discussion

I think is B https://meraki.cisco.com/blog/2018/10/real-time-alerting-with-webhooks/

Scanning API doesn't provide wireless health alerts. Dashboard API does, which uses a pull model, so I would go with C.

chatgpt thinks daemon should be used for this one, so suggesting C. But I still think webhooks are better for alert count and answer is B . here is the reasoning from AI anyway: "So for the exam scenario—“a timeframe custom dashboard with a wireless health alert count”—the prerequisite they’re after is a daemon that consumes the Wireless Health endpoints of the Meraki Dashboard API (option C). Webhooks are optional/adjacent, not required, and don’t alone satisfy arbitrary time-window reporting."

correct anwer given

B. To obtain data from Cisco Meraki, you would typically use the Meraki Dashboard API, which provides access to various endpoints including wireless health information. Webhooks can be set up to receive real-time notifications from the Meraki Dashboard API when certain events occur, such as changes in wireless health or the occurrence of alerts. Therefore, you would need a publicly available HTTP server to receive these webhooks from the Meraki Dashboard API, allowing your dashboard to update dynamically based on the received data.

it says timeframe not real-time so i'll go with C

Correct answer: B Once set up, the webhook will send an HTTP POST to a unique URL, but only when a certain condition or criteria has been met to trigger an alert. So, for example, if you’re only interested in being notified when a device goes offline, Webhook Alerting will be more efficient since it will only transmit information when the status of the device goes from online to offline. https://meraki.cisco.com/blog/2018/10/real-time-alerting-with-webhooks/

B is correct

I think is B https://meraki.cisco.com/blog/2018/10/real-time-alerting-with-webhooks/

It is B.