Within an established AI governance infrastructure, what might be the most effective governance action to handle third-party AI systems deemed to be high-risk?
A.
Align organizational impact assessment activities with relevant regulatory or legal requirements.
B.
Re-evaluate the purchase of the third-party AI system deemed to be high-risk, and consider other vendors.
C.
Establish policies for handling third-party system failures that include consideration of redundancy mechanisms for vital third-party AI system.
D.
Delegate the power, resources and authorization among executive leadership to perform risk management to each appropriate level throughout the management chain.
Within a mature AI governance infrastructure, one of the key actions when dealing with third-party AI systems classified as high-risk is to reassess whether engaging with that vendor or tool is appropriate at all.
Avoiding third-party tools isn’t realistic; adopting them safely and responsibly is. So A is the answer.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.AIGP Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
2f70e80
1 month, 2 weeks agocloudera
2 days, 14 hours ago