Suggested Answer:ABC🗳️
Plan driven approaches to business analysis practices most often use the formal type of communications. This means the communication of the actual requirements is in writing, and often uses pre-defined forms requiring signatory approvals. All project documentation is normally archived as part of the project history. Face-to-face is an effective communication method, but for plan-driven approaches, formal communication is preferred in regard to requirements. Ad hoc describes the sudden, quick conversations. This is an informal approach to communication and isn't appropriate for a plan-driven business analysis approach.
A plan-driven business analysis approach (also called predictive or waterfall) emphasizes formal, structured, and documented processes:
1. Formal and face-to-face methods are appropriate because they provide clarity, traceability, and adherence to process standards.
2. Informal and ad hoc techniques are not suitable in a plan-driven context because they lack consistency, documentation, and repeatability, which are essential for structured governance.
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CCBA Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
_AKay_
2 weeks ago